Yu, Yih-hsien. "Whitehead and Postmodern Education." Tunghai University. Unpublished work.  

俞懿嫻. "后现代教育与怀海德." 东海大学。 未出版作.

Abstract

By the end of the nineteenth century, Friedrich W. Nietzsche, the forerunner of contemporary deconstructive postmodernism, had prophesized the arrival of European Nihilism and it was indeed followed by the torrents of anti-metaphysics of the twentieth century, wiping out all traditional ideals and value systems. These torrents of “postmodernism” were against the authority of traditional culture as well as against the modern society of high-tech and capitalism. Now we are in the early years of the twenty-first century, and the “postmodern way” unavoidably becomes a part of our life and deeply influences the theory and the practice of our school education. Yet modern education as the child of the Enlightenment believes in social progress and human emancipation from ignorance via public education and science/technology and it has made modernity as its presupposition. The very rationale of modern education is found on the idea of an autonomous person who is endowed with the capacity of self-control and self-improvement, a rational agent with his own end. All this seems to be incompatible with the postmodern project which seeks to delegitimate reason and knowledge, to decenter the conscious subject, and to deconstruct language as well as culture. The postmodern project denies the concept of a rational, autonomous individual and embraces the decentering subject governed by unconsciousness; will to power, and insatiable desire. Alfred North Whitehead, being one of the most important metaphysicians of the twentieth century, had proposed a different program from that of the deconstructive postmodernists. He was in many respects agreed with those postmodern philosophers in their refutations of modernity and of certain presuppositions of science and technology. Nonetheless, he never gave up the supremacy of reason and all the necessary factors of which a worldview is composed. In their rejection of the modern worldview, the deconstructive postmodernists dismissed the traditional ideas of ideals, value, meaning, selfhood, divinity, and God, which are indispensable for any human perspectives. It is undeniable that the deconstruct project can only lead us to relativism and nihilism with no way out. In the early stage of his philosophical development, Whitehead also unleashed a series of criticism of the modern worldview and its presuppositions, such as representational epistemology, the substantial concept of subject, and the Christian God. However, he also managed to make speculative reason a supplement to the modern scientific reason, the interrelatedness of events a replacement of the isolation of vacuous substances, and the union of facts and value a substitution for value-free facts. And above all, Whitehead has explored both the aesthetic and logical functions of language and emphasized the limitation of scientific language. By this way Whitehead’s philosophy seems to propose an alternative to the postmodern educators who are aware of the crisis caused by the modernity, and at the same time are reluctant to be trapped by the postmodernity.
 

在十九世紀末,解構後現代主義的先驅尼采曾宣告歐洲虛無主義的來臨,遂令二十世紀西方當代哲學發展出淹沒傳統觀念、理想、價與意義的浪潮。這股「後現代」的浪潮反對傳統權威與文化理想,也不滿於現代科學理性與高科技、資本主義的社會。時至今日,在廿一世紀初,「後現代」已不知不覺地成我們生活的一部。「育」作後現代生活中不可或缺的一環,無論其理論與實踐均受到這「後現代氛圍」的影響。然而「現代育」正是最具現代精神的「蒙之子」。普及育,傳授知識,使大多數人從無知愚昧中解放出來,其背後的預設便是「現代」。現代育家向以培育自動自發、自主自立的理性主體要務。而「後現代」卻以推翻「理性」、「系統知識」、「自我意識」和「主體」己任,以尋求由潛意識、語言、權力和慾望所構成的「去中心的主體」其特色。當代歷程哲學的奠基者懷德海是二十世紀西方最偉大的形上學家之一;當形上學成眾矢之的之際,懷德海和極其少數的哲學家卻仍堅持形上學的必要與價,使他在當代哲學或「後現代哲學」中扮演了重要角色。與之相較,解構的後現代哲學家們在批判反省現代科學世界觀與傳統哲學之餘,全盤否定且瓦解了建立世界觀與系統哲學必備的觀念、理想、價、意義、目的、自我、神聖性與上帝等念,使得他們的哲學陷入相對主義和虛無主義的泥沼,無以自拔。懷德海雖在其哲學發展之初,也曾以批判現代世界觀其主要課題,反對科技理性、實體化的主體、表象認識論以及傳統的上帝觀,但他以思辨理性補救科學理性之失,以事物的整體相關性取代事物的孤立性與原子性,以「事實即價」取代「價中立」,以邏輯與感性兼備的語言功能取代抽象的科學語言。可以說懷德海不但洞悉了「現代」的弊端,且提出積極建設性的取代方案。如此懷海德的後現代哲學,「後現代育」指示了新的出路,得探索廿一世紀育新契機的有志之士參考。